- Engels
- Study
- Law
- intern. publiekrecht
- THE ROLE OF NOT PARTY IN THE TRIAL BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL
LIAKOPOULOS, DIMITRIS
THE ROLE OF NOT PARTY IN THE TRIAL BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL
75,00incl BTW
Vertrouwd sinds 1927
Persoonlijke aandacht en advies
Vanaf 17,50 gratis verzenden NL & BE
Meer dan 150.000 artikelen online
Omschrijving THE ROLE OF NOT PARTY IN THE TRIAL BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL
The limitations of the present investigation impose to restrict the analysis to the trial system of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), as it is not possible to examine in depth the problem of the position of the third state. The present study
intends to contribute to the reconstruction of the structural features of the intervention as not party, as foreseen by articles 62 and 63, of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) Statute. The first part of this survey is dedicated to a general i
ntroduction to ICJ function (including principle and legality of acts of ICJ) and continues with the examination of the position of the third state absent from the judgment. First of all, the foundation and the objective and subjective limits of the
res judicata are analyzed on the one hand. On the other, there are additional effects with respect to the judgment that the international sentence is likely to produce towards third states and to which the institution of intervention, in its various
forms, intends to remedy. The second part is dedicated to the examination of the international trial. Within this framework the absence of an interested party may lead the judge to refuse to exercise its jurisdictional power, where the subject who wa
s not involved in the trial represents a real "necessary party". The examination of this rule, as stated and applied by ICJ, provides a further piece of the framework in which the figure of the third party intervention is inscribed. The type of incid
ence that a decision whose obligatoriness rests solely on the consent of litigating states has on the legal positions of third states is partly different from the prejudice that can be caused to individuals by a sentence rendered inter alias. It foll
ows that the reasons that can induce a state to decide to take part in a procedure promoted by other states have at times been different from the reasons that induce private individuals to intervene in internal judgments.
Dimitris Liakopoulo
s is Professor of international law, European Union law and criminal and procedural law in various Universities in US and Europe. Attorney at Law at New York and Brussels. ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1048-6468.
intends to contribute to the reconstruction of the structural features of the intervention as not party, as foreseen by articles 62 and 63, of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) Statute. The first part of this survey is dedicated to a general i
ntroduction to ICJ function (including principle and legality of acts of ICJ) and continues with the examination of the position of the third state absent from the judgment. First of all, the foundation and the objective and subjective limits of the
res judicata are analyzed on the one hand. On the other, there are additional effects with respect to the judgment that the international sentence is likely to produce towards third states and to which the institution of intervention, in its various
forms, intends to remedy. The second part is dedicated to the examination of the international trial. Within this framework the absence of an interested party may lead the judge to refuse to exercise its jurisdictional power, where the subject who wa
s not involved in the trial represents a real "necessary party". The examination of this rule, as stated and applied by ICJ, provides a further piece of the framework in which the figure of the third party intervention is inscribed. The type of incid
ence that a decision whose obligatoriness rests solely on the consent of litigating states has on the legal positions of third states is partly different from the prejudice that can be caused to individuals by a sentence rendered inter alias. It foll
ows that the reasons that can induce a state to decide to take part in a procedure promoted by other states have at times been different from the reasons that induce private individuals to intervene in internal judgments.
Dimitris Liakopoulo
s is Professor of international law, European Union law and criminal and procedural law in various Universities in US and Europe. Attorney at Law at New York and Brussels. ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1048-6468.
Specificaties
- MerkMaklu Uitgevers N.V.
- GroepRECHT ALGEMEEN (820)
- Barcode9789046610152
- LeverstatusActief
Reviews
0.0/5.0
Gemiddelde uit 0 reviews
Meest behulpzame reviews
Nog geen reviews geschreven